Spring 2002
MAS.890 (H) 2-0-7

Special Projects in Media Arts and Sciences:

Workshop in Community-Maintainable Collaborative Online Spaces

Thursdays
10am - 12n Boston time (Garden Conference Room)
3 - 5pm Dublin time (2nd Floor Meeting Room)

V. Michael Bove, Jr. (MIT Media Lab)
and
Stefan Agamanolis (Media Lab Europe)

Course participants

This seminar will explore concepts of spatial and temporal remoteness, and how they relate to computationally-mediated collaborative activities, especially expressive and creative activities beyond the scope of traditional ``cooperative work'' research. We will focus on community issues including anonymity, privacy, presence, and togetherness, as well as the design of environments that can evolve with the users' needs. Particular emphasis will be given to time and the impact of time zones and network latencies. The course will also delve into technical issues ranging from the construction and operation of modern communication networks to the limitations of popular input and output devices as interfaces between the physical and virtual environments. The course itself will be an experiment in its own subject matter as it will be held simultaneously at both the MIT Media Lab and Media Lab Europe and will involve assignments and class projects in which students in both locations must collaborate.


TENTATIVE SCHEDULE

February 7

Overview of course. What is it about? What is it not about? Why are we doing it? Introductions of instructors and students. Introduction to the technology supporting this class (email, web, iCom, Isis).

Reading:

Sara A Bly, Steve R. Harrison, and Susan Irwin, "Media spaces: Bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment", CACM, vol 36, no 1, January 1993.

Mark Weiser, "The Computer for the 21st Century", Scientific American, vol 265, no 3, pp 94-104, 1991. Draft version online: http://www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/SciAmDraft3.html

William Buxton. "Telepresence: integrating shared task and person spaces." Proceedings of Graphics Interface 1992, 123-129. http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/OTP/papers/bill.buxton/shared_space.html

Jonathan Grudin, "Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces", Proc. CSCW 1988, pp. 85-93, September 1988.

Assignment 1: Getting acquainted

Pick one person you don't know from the close end and one person from the far end. Schedule a "date" and get to know those persons through whatever means you wish. Keep notes -- you will need them for discussion and for the next assignment. Write one page or so on each of the people you meet. Write these in the form of a letter or email to the other person, describing your meeting with them and what you think you found out about them as a person, even beyond what you discussed in your interaction. You will be sending these "letters" at the conclusion of the assignment.


February 14

Historical context on Media Spaces. History and evolution. Case studies.

Minutes of the meeting

Reading:

V. Michael Bove, Jr., "Connected by Media", IEEE Multimedia, 8:4, Oct.-Dec. 2001. http://www.media.mit.edu/~vmb/papers/00959094.pdf

V. Michael Bove, Jr., "Will Anyone Really Need a Web Browser in Five Years?", Proc. 2000 Montreux World Television Forum, 2000. http://www.media.mit.edu/~vmb/papers/Bove-Montreux2000.pdf

Amy Bruckman, MOOSE Crossing: Construction, Community, and Learning in a Networked Virtual World for Kids, PhD Dissertation, MIT, 1997 http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~asb/thesis/

Henry Jenkins, "Interactive Audiences?: The 'Collective Intelligence' of Media Fans" to appear in Dan Harries (ed.), The New Media Book, (London: British Film Institute, forthcoming) http://web.mit.edu/21fms/www/faculty/henry3/collective%20intelligence.html

Assignment 2: Technology skews our perceptions in sneaky ways

Send the "letters" you wrote last assignment to each of the people you met. Obtain and read the letters sent to you in return. Collect your own notes as well, and write a few paragraphs on the experience. Focus on and compare the technologies and the interfaces involved in each interaction. What did the other person get right about you and what did they get wrong? Why? Expound upon 1-2 key points that came out of the experience for you. Submit these via email before class next week.

Electronic submissions are preferred. PDF or HTML are best. Feel free to embed/attach any other media, such as photos, in these submissions.

Assignment 2 submissions:
Arianna Bassoli
Jonah Brucker-Cohen
Ivan Chardin
Cian Cullinan
Jennica Falk
Tristan Jehan
Karrie Karahalios
Matt Karau
Michael Lew
Andrea Lockerd
Dan Maynes-Aminzade
Valentina Nisi 1 2
Gian Pangaro
Surj Patel
Taly Sharon
Edison Thomaz
Parul Vora
Alison Wood


February 21

Presentation and discussion of Assignments 1 and 2

Minutes of the meeting

Reading:

Tom Standage, The Victorian Internet, Berkley Publishing Group, 1999.

Clifford Geertz, "Thick Description: Toward an Interpretative Theory of Culture," in The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books, 1973.

Alphonse Chapanis, "Interactive Human Communication", Scientific American, v232, pp. 36-42, 1975.

Joel Stein, "Will Cybersex be Better than Real Sex?", Time, June 19, 2000. http://www.time.com/time/reports/v21/tech/mag_sex.html

Stefan Agamanolis, et al., Isis Web site: http://www.media.mit.edu/isis

Assignment 3: Study the intricacies of human to human encounters

Pick a collaborative activity that common wisdom dictates is necessary to perform face to face or in close proximity to the other persons involved. This activity may be as odd or unusual as you wish, and you may wish to make it relevant in some way to your research outside of the course, though this is not a necessity. Arrange and engage in this activity with the counterparts of your choice, or observe others engaging in this activity (be sure not to invade privacy).

Create a photo essay, a short video, or another type of media to describe the activity. What kinds of interactions happen between the humans? Work to discover and capture the subtle things that aren't perhaps immediately noticable. What kinds of things enhance or detract from the experience? Then, envision how the activity might be accomplished "at a distance" -- make drawings or use other media to illustrate your ideas, and complement these with some written remarks.

Prepare a ~3 minute class presentation as well as an electronic version that can be posted on the course web site. We will send information about video/audio/image formats that will work for presenting over the iCom in class.

Assignment 3 submissions:
Arianna Bassoli and Valentina Nisi
Jonah Brucker-Cohen
Ivan Chardin
Cian Cullinan and Matt Karau
Jennica Falk
Tristan Jehan
Karrie Karahalios
Michael Lew
Andrea Lockerd, Surj Patel, Edison Thomaz
Dan Maynes-Aminzade
Gian Pangaro
Taly Sharon
Parul Vora
Alison Wood


February 28

Enabling technologies for collaboration spaces. History of the Internet, interfaces, protocols and layers.

Minutes of the meeting

Reading:

Barry M. Leiner, et. al. "A Brief History of the Internet". http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/brief.shtml

Continue working on assignment 3


March 7

Presentations and discussion of assignment 3

Minutes of the meeting

Reading:

Ellen Isaacs and John C. Tang, "What Video Can and Cannot Do for Collaboration: A Case Study", Multimedia Systems, v2, pp. 63-73, 1994.

Jim Hollan and Scott Stornetta, "Beyond Being There", Proc. CHI 1992, pp. 119-125.

Assignment 4: The little things are sometimes the most important

Pick a single human behavior, or a behavior displayed in the environment perhaps not caused by a human. It can be as subtle a behavior as you wish, and it can be related to something you discovered through the previous assignment or a completely new idea. Focus tightly on this behavior and describe it in extreme detail. Where and when is it exhibited? What causes it? How is it displayed? How is it noticed? What purpose does it serve, if any? What effect does it have on other people or on the environment? Use more than words to describe your investigation -- drawings, photos, video, audio...

Then, design a system (or systems) to convey this behavior to a far away place. Don't let shortcomings in current technologies limit your imagination. Describe some of the technical details you envision, and again, use more than just words to express these designs. For "extra credit" build a prototype or implement part of your idea.

We encourage you to work with at least one but not more than two other people. We also strongly encourage working with someone from the far side and/or someone who you have not worked with before. Use the contacts you have made on the other side to scope out partners.

Prepare a ~3 minute class presentation as well as an electronic version that can be posted on the course web site. Preferred formats for submission are PDF, HTML (with all images/media files collected together), Quicktime or MPEG movies, and most audio formats. Please do not submit raw Microsoft Word or Powerpoint files.

Assignment 4 submissions:
Florian Mueller and Jennica Falk 1 2
Cian Cullinan
Karrie Karahalios
Ivan Chardin, Taly Sharon, and Alison Wood
Parul Vora and Jonah Brucker-Cohen
Dan Maynes-Aminzade


March 14

Presence, awareness, and togetherness. What does it mean to be "present"? Why is it important? Philosophical and theoretical views of presence.

Minutes of the meeting

Reading:

William Mitchell, e-topia, MIT Press, 2000.

Continue working on Assignment 4


March 21

Presentations and discussion of Assignment 4

Minutes of the meeting

Reading:

Alan Lightman, Einstein's Dreams, Warner Books, 1993.

Assignment 5: Time changes everything

Pick a collaborative activity that common wisdom dictates is necessary to perform synchronously (that is, at the same time) with the other persons involved. Observe the activity or engage in it yourself, and describe it in detail in the media of your choice.

Then, envision how the activity might be performed in an asynchronous manner, and design a system to support this new form of the activity. Express your ideas in drawings, photos, or a video, as well as in writing. How does the asynchrounous activity differ from its synchronous counterpart? Why might it be valuable in its altered form? For "extra credit" build a prototype or implement part of your idea.

As in the previous assignment, we encourage you to work with at least one but not more than two other people. We also strongly encourage working with someone from the far side and/or someone who you have not worked with before. Use the contacts you have made on the other side to scope out partners.

Prepare a ~3 minute class presentation as well as an electronic version that can be posted on the course web site. Preferred formats for submission are PDF, HTML (with all images/media files collected together), Quicktime or MPEG movies, and most audio formats. Please do not submit raw Microsoft Word or Powerpoint files.

Assignment 5 submissions:
Matthew Karau and Cian Cullinan
Ivan Chardin and Taly Sharon
Florian Mueller and Jennica Falk
Parul Vora and Jonah Brucker-Cohen
Karrie Karahalios
Dan Maynes-Aminzade and Gian Pangaro


March 28

MIT Spring Break, no class


April 4

Temporal remoteness. Issues of time zones, network latencies. Concepts of time in different cultures.

Reading:

Italo Calvino (William Weaver, translator), Invisible Cities, Harvest/HBJ, 1986. (selected portions)

Continue working on Assignment 5


April 11

Presentations and discussion of assignment 5

Reading:

Massachusetts law on hidden cameras and microphones, http://www.rtnda.org/resources/hiddencamera/massachusetts.html


April 18

Surveillance, privacy, anonymity. How does the technology change the interaction? What kinds of trouble can one get in?

Reading:

Hiroshi Ishii, Minoru Kobayashi, and Kazuho Arita, "Iterative Design of Seamless Collaboration Media," CACM, vol 37, no 8, August 1994.

Assignment: Final project proposals.

Form a group of 2-3 people, where there should be a mix of people from both sides if possible. Pick or invent a collaborative activity, or a component of an activity, that you would like to design and build a system to support. The system may use components of or be an expansion of a previous assignment.


April 25

CHI in Minneapolis, no class

Complete negotiations on final projects by today and begin work.


May 2

Guest lecture: Design and Collaboration Media


May 9

TBA, activity possibly connected with Digital Life meeting in Cambridge


May 16

Final project presentations and demos

Final project submissions:
Karrie Karahalios
Dan Maynes-Aminzade and Gian Pangaro
Tristan Jehan and Michael Lew
Ivan Chardin and Surj Patel
Taly Sharon
Parul Vora and Jonah Brucker-Cohen