| Vitor F. Pamplona*
Ankit
Mohan
Manuel
M.
Oliveira* Ramesh
Raskar David Schafran Erick Passos Everett Lawson Camera Culture Group - MIT Media Lab * Visiting from Instituto de Informática - UFRGS See our latest works on Cataract Mapping and tailored displays |
![]() OneSight's Mission Trip - Nairoby, Kenya LVPEI's Clinical Trials - Hyderabad, India |
| Figure 1: Netra is a $2 clip-on eyepiece that goes on top of a cell phone. The user looks through this eye piece and interactively aligns the displayed patterns by clicking the buttons. The number of clicks required to bring the patterns into alignment indicates the refractive error. Our optometry solution combines inexpensive optical elements and interactive software components to create a new portable and inexpensive device that mimics (and replaces) the expensive laser-based Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometers. Ilustration: Tiago Allen |
We introduce a portable and inexpensive solution for estimating refractive errors in the human eye. While expensive optical devices for automatic estimation of refractive correction exist, our goal is to greatly simplify the mechanism by putting the human subject in the loop. A traditional Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor uses lasers and highly sensitive digital sensor which makes those solutions expensive, bulky and requires trained professionals.
Our solution creates an inverse Shack-Hartmann sensor. It is based on a high-resolution programmable display and combines inexpensive optical elements, interactive GUI, and computational reconstruction. The key idea is to interface a lenticular view-dependent display with the human eye at close range - a few millimeters apart. Via this platform, we create a new range of interactivity that is extremely sensitive to parameters of the human eye, such as the refractive errors, focal range, focusing speed, lens opacity, etc. We propose several simple optical setups, verify their accuracy, precision, and validate them in a user study.
|
Ignition Grant
![]() Innovation Grant |

|
|
![]() |

NETRA at NASA Launch
|
|
Ramesh Raskar @ NASA Launch
|
1st Prize: Vodafone Wireless Innovation Project 2011 |
The NETRA system uses the dual of a Shack-Hartman sensor, and replaces the laser with simple user interaction. Todayś methods using the Shack-Hartmann sensor shine a laser into the eye of the patient, and measure the reflected light with a wavefront sensor. Hence they are quite expensive, and require a trained professional operator. A cell phone based solution significantly reduces the cost of the device and makes it appropriate for self-evaluation, while still providing comparable data.
The subject looks into this display at a very close range and aligns (overlaps) displayed patterns (Figure 1). Since the light rays from these patterns pass through different regions of the visual system, the alignment task gives a measure of the optical distortions of those regions. The subject repeats this procedure for a few meridians with appropriate variation in the patterns. The system computes the corresponding refractive error for myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism.
![]() |
| Figure
2: Current prototypes using the Samsung Behold II and the Nexus One. We
place an
optical phase plate to create virtual images and achieve 0.6 and 0.4
diopter
resolution respectively. |
Evaluation: We tested accuracy and precision of the technique in two experiments: (i) using lenses and a SLR camera and (ii) comparing our device against actual prescriptions in a user study. The resolution is 0.4 diopters using the Nexus One device (focal length 30mm). The Apple iPhone 4G, with the new Retina Display should achieve a resolution of approximately 0.28 diopters (focal length 30mm). For measuring eye correction, the average absolute errors from the known prescriptions were under 0.5 diopter (σ = 0.2) for both cylindrical and spherical powers. The average absolute error of our estimates of the cylindrical axis was under 6 degrees. Optometrists typically prescribe in multiples of 0.25 diopter, and 10 degrees axis.
In controlled user experiments with 16 subjects, the average absolute errors from the known prescriptions were under 0.5 diopter, with a standard deviation of 0.2 diopter for both cylindrical (astigmatism) and spherical powers (myopia and hyperopia). The average absolute error of the cylindrical axis is less than 6 degrees. We are able to achieve this without the use of cycloplegic eye drops for relaxing accommodation.
Limitations: Since our solution relies on subjective feedback, it cannot be used by individuals who cannot reliably perform the user-required tasks, such as very young children.
Existing systems to diagnose refractive eye conditions include Snellen charts (with a set of trial lenses), auto-refractometers, and wavefront aberrometers. The NETRA solution offers some unique benefits over these existing techniques, which make it specially suited for deployment in developing countries:
![]() |
| Figure 3: Current solutions for analyzing refractive errors. Subjective Methods (far left and center) rely upon the user's judgment of sharpness or blurriness of a test object. Objective Methods (far right) require a mechanically moving lens, a camera, a trained technician, and a large investment. |
Refraction Services Requirement on Developing Countries [Vision 2020 Report]: The following table provides a comprehensive list of techniques and equipment for assessing refractive conditions of an eye.
|
Technique |
Objectivity |
Speed |
Accuracy/ Reliability |
Electricity Requirements |
Mobility |
Training |
Equipment Requirements (Cost bracket)* |
Cost Efficiency rank |
Suitability for Children |
|
Retinoscopy (Slit Lamp) |
Objective = does not rely on patient responses |
Fast |
+/- 0.50D unless affected by media opacities or accommodation |
Batteries |
Good |
High |
Retinoscope, plus trial lens set and trial frame ($2000), OR
phoropter ($1600), OR
variable focus specs ($1600) |
Economical – low up-front cost, high durability, low maintenance |
Sometimes |
|
Subjective refraction (Eye Charts) |
Subjective = does rely on patient responses |
Slow |
+/- 0.25D but dependent on patient reliability |
None |
Good |
High |
Trial lens set and trial frame ($1400), OR
phoropter ($1000), OR variable
focus specs ($600) |
Economical |
Sometimes (only with experienced practitioners) |
|
Auto Refraction |
Objective |
Fast |
Relies on both equipment and patient factors |
Mains |
Low |
Basic |
Auto-refractor ($15K) |
Expensive |
No |
|
Portable Auto Refraction |
Objective |
Fast |
Relies on both equipment and patient factors |
Mains or batteries |
Good |
Basic |
Portable auto-refractor ($20K) |
Expensive |
No |
|
NETRA |
Subjective |
Fast |
Relies on both equipment and patient factors < 0.50D unless affected by accommodation |
Cell phone batteries |
Excellent |
Basic |
Plastic Piece ($2) and a cell phone ($300). |
Economical |
Yes |
* Costs were extracted from the Vision2020 report. Some cheaper options may exist - for example, we were able to acquire a set of trial lenses for $300. Note that simple reading charts can be expensive because they must be used under optimal lighting conditions and need a set of trial lenses.
More than two billion people worldwide have refractive error. Very few have access to quality eye-care because existing solutions require a trained optometrist or expensive equipment [VISION2020 Report, Holden2007]. This impacts the developing world in a significant way:
* WHO definition for blindness: vision worse that 3/60 in the better eye.
Uncorrected refractive problems may lead to a significant loss in productivity, with estimates ranging from USD 88.74 to USD 133 billion. To put things in perspective, this productivity loss exceeds the annual GDP of 46 of the 52 African countries. Our technology can address all types of refractive errors.
Acknowledgments: Thanks to the volunteers who tested our device, Xiaoxi Wang and Andrew Song for prototype construction, Tiago Allen Oliveira for illustrations, Tyler Hutchison for the video voiceover, Taya Leary for her relentless support, the entire Camera Culture group for all the useful discussions; and the reviewers for their valuable feedback. Dr. James Kobler (Mass. General Hospital), Dr. Dr. Joseph Ciolino (Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary), and Dr. Fuensanta Vera Diaz (Schepens Eye Research Institute) provided valuable resources and insightful discussions about optometry and ophthalmology. We thank Dick Lyon and Google's open source office for Google Nexus One mobile phone, and Samsung Electronics for Samsung Behold II mobile phone. Vitor and Manuel acknowledge CNPq-Brazil fellowships 142563/2008-0, 200763/2009-1, 200284/2009-6, 476954/2008-8. Ramesh Raskar is supported by an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship.


![]() © Mike Ritter / ritterbin.com |
![]() © Mike Ritter / ritterbin.com |
![]() © Mike Ritter / ritterbin.com |
![]() © Mike Ritter / ritterbin.com |
![]() © Mike Ritter / ritterbin.com |
![]() © Mike Ritter / ritterbin.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Picture Credit: Anderson Maciel |
![]() Picture Credit: Anderson Maciel |
![]() Picture Credit: Anderson Maciel |
![]() Picture Credit: Anderson Maciel |
![]() Image Credit:Dominick
M Maino
|

|
![]() (Credit:
Ethan Solomon)
|
![]() (Credit:
Ethan Solomon)
|
![]() (Credit:
Ethan Solomon)
|
![]() (Credit: Ethan Solomon) |
![]() (Credit:
Ethan Solomon)
|
![]() |
![]() |
Andrew
Bastawrous
|
![]() Matthew
Burton
|
![]() Hannah
Kuper
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Dr. Vicki Chen at Tufts
|
![]() |
![]() Photo: Michal Massey
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Home | News | Join Us | People | Projects | Publications | Talks | Courses