15.795 Technology Roadmapping
Fall 2002 : Fridays : 10–11:30am : MIT Sloan School :
e51-063 : 9 units
COURSE SYLLABUS, DESCRIPTION & OUTLINE
(DRAFT as of 5
September 2002)
Prof. Charles Fine,
E53-390, charley@mit.edu, x3-3632,
Office Hours: By Appointment
Admin. Support: Ms. Anna Piccolo, E53-390, apiccolo@mit.edu, x3-6605
RA: Joost Bonsen, jpbonsen@mit.edu, 617-930-0415
Course Website: http://sloanspace.mit.edu
Summary – Technology
Roadmapping (TRM for short) is a 9 unit Fall Semester 2002 Masters
Research Seminar on exploring long-term industry dynamics of emerging
technologies. Students perform original
work crafting or enhancing a Roadmap in a technology-business domain of their
choice. Thesis & Special Project
opportunities are offered & encouraged.
Caveat – It’s crucial that all participating students realize this is a Research Seminar, meaning that all participants must perform original (and hard) work. You should be doing this because you think this sort of in-depth research is highly aligned with your professional interests and aspirations. For example, research you will perform for this Seminar will be an excellent entrée to CTOs, key people in companies in your industry of choice, and so forth. We, in turn, will be offering sometimes half-baked & even preliminary ideas, sharing lessons-learned along the way, figuring things out as we go, and generally investing a lot of time and braincycles into really understanding what Technology Roadmapping could and should be.
Seminar Description – This
seminar will explore the purposes and development of Technology Roadmaps for
systematically mapping out possible development paths for various technological
domains and the industries that build on them.
Data of importance for such Roadmaps include rates of
innovation, key bottlenecks, physical limitations, improvement trendlines,
corporate intent, and value-chain and industry evolutionary paths.
The course will build on ongoing work on the MIT Communications
Technology Roadmap project, and begin exploring other domains as well. Towards this end, we will have faculty guest
speakers – mostly lab directors drawn from a spectrum of research centers at
MIT – each of whom will share their long-term perspective on their fields and
what they perceive to be open and compelling directions for future effort.
Seminar Goals – We hope to foster collaborative
efforts between 1-3 students, MIT researchers, & Industry Sponsors, cutting
across MIT research areas. Furthermore,
we hope this includes Cross Industry Benchmarking, ideally in partnership with
Industrial Sponsors of current and potential research at MIT. We’d like to develop an “MIT Method” of
Roadmapping which integrates Technology AND Business Dynamics. Ideally, we attract students passionate
about technology sector – however broadly or narrowly defined – who are
committed to producing coherent & complete Tech Roadmap (Draft 1.0) during
Fall Semester.
Our
overall TRM aspiration is to build up a rich and thriving MIT Technology
Roadmapping Initiative, one which integrates many currently disparate or
fragmented research veins.
Elements of the MIT Technology
Roadmapping Initiative –
·
Business Cycle Dynamics – e.g. systems dynamics-like models of the
bullwhip effect
·
Industry Structure Dynamics – e.g. the
double helix in Clockspeed
·
Corporate Strategy Dynamics – e.g.
S-curves & dynamic analyses of players in the value chain
·
Technology Dynamics – e.g. the
Semiconductor Industry Association's roadmap built around Moore's law
·
Regulatory Policy Dynamics – e.g.
Cross-National, Cross-Sector
Purpose of Roadmapping – Tech
Roadmapping allows for a technology-and-Industry-level of observation &
analysis. Ideally the effort encourages
Broad faculty participation, drawn from Multi-Disciplinary parts of the
Institute, so as to cover the Emerging Technology spectrum and assessment of
Business Implications of Technology trends.
If done well, this offers a unifying, big-picture perspective, and a
long-term “futurecasting” view.
Furthermore, we are neutral-ground for discussion among industry players
& MIT research sponsors.
Possible Benefits of TRM
·
We closely observe Value Chain Evolution over time,
·
Language for discussion between business & technology
world
·
Structured basis for interaction Cross Value Chains, between
academia & industry, spanning basic research through application
·
Bridging between vertical “silos” of research – e.g.
MicroPhotonics à LIDS à Media Lab à eBiz Center
·
Publishing Collaborative Tech Roadmaps
·
Risk goes down, Capital Investment goes up (generally)
Technology Roadmapping
Essentials
·
Performance indicators
·
Innovations over time, trendlines
·
Physical limitations
·
Value Chains
·
Industry Structure
Examples of Degrees of
Technology Aggregation
·
Communications Roadmap
o
Optical Communications
§
MicroPhotonics
o
Wireless
§
Personal Area Networking
§
Cellular G3, G4, G5
·
Medical Imaging
o
MRI
§
Functional MRI
·
Nanotechnology
o
Precision Engineering
§
AFM
·
Biological Engineering
o
Bacterial Robotics
Enrollment & Expectations – Open to truly dedicated students who commit to active attendance, the readings, the necessary independent research, & crafting a high-quality Technology Roadmap in your technology domain of choice.
Attendance – Required participation in the
TRM Seminar is quite intensive and includes attending all Friday sessions as
well as relevant technology seminars in labs throughout MIT, local conferences,
and the like. We have appended links to
calendars and event listings, but these are not exhaustive, so please seek out
further offerings most connected to your TRM domain of choice.
Furthermore, we will be scheduling formal meetings in the
last third of the semester with each TRM individual or team effort. The is specifica
Readings – We have appended lists of both Roadmapping links at
& beyond MIT and will have additional updates and recommendation online and
sent to you via email. You will note
from the grading schema that we actively encourage and reward those of you who
add to our library of TRM links and thus help one another.
Assignments – We have
three basic, escalating assignments.
1.
MiniMap -- we would like you to pick a
preliminary technology area and prepare a MiniMap by Week 3 (September 20th). You may do this as individuals or
teams. A MiniMap is a “quick’n’dirty”
5-10 PowerPoint slideshow highlighting key information about your area of
interest and the top open questions and concerns you and industry players have about
future technology trends.
2.
Update -- we would like you to hone in on
your principal technology area and work intensively to prepare your
roadmap. You’ll be presenting 5-10
slide updates on your TRM effort, highlighting especially things which you think
are unique to your sector, especially worth sharing, open areas of concern and
uncertainty, and so forth. This is not
intended to be a final presentation or performance.
3.
TRM Finale-- we would like to you prepare a
logical and exhaustive TRM compilation by the end of the semester. While this is necessarily a “living
document” and we fully expect you and/or future students to extend and expand
on it, nevertheless we would like this to be as complete a snapshot of understanding
in your technology-industry sector as possible. Between the Update and the Finale, we will be formally meeting
Grading – Students are graded 20% based on class
participation & attendance, 15% on progress report presentations &
documentation, 45% on the quality & content of the final TRM presentation
& documentation, 5% for adding novel reference material to our library of
links and TRM documentation, and 15% discretionary for demonstrably helping
classmates improve their roadmapping abilities, sharing lessons-learned, and generally
going “above & beyond.”
Potential MIT Technology Roadmap Domains – Students
pick their own Technology & Industry domain of greatest interest. Example domains include, but are not limited
to: Nanotechnology, BioInformatics,
Medical Devices, OrganoElectronics, MEMS, MicroPhotonics,
Geno/Proteino/Celleomics, NeuroMedical Imaging, Neurotechnology, Penny
Diagnostics, and more
Teamwork – We allow
students to work either alone or in teams of 2 or 3 consisting of people of
their own choice. For grading purposes,
teamwork will be judged per-capita, with special effort made to assess
individual contribution within the team.
We will not tolerate free-riders in this seminar; everyone must be a
full contributor.
Calendar
Version 020905
# |
Date |
Topic |
Speaker |
Status |
Assignment |
1 |
9/6 |
Introduction |
Fine |
Confirmed |
Student email top 3-5 tech sectors of interest &
mini-bio |
2 |
9/13 |
TeleCom’n Roadmap |
Fine |
Confirmed |
Luncheon after for mixing |
3 |
9/20 |
Student Presentations |
-- |
-- |
Students present MiniMaps |
4 |
9/27 |
OPEN |
|
|
-- |
5 |
10/4 |
Neuro/Medical Imaging |
Rosen, Sorensen |
Confirmed |
-- |
6 |
10/11 |
Sloan 50th Panel |
Brown, Brooks, Lundquist, et al |
Confirmed |
-- |
7 |
10/18 |
CO2 Sequestration / Environmental |
Jacoby, Herzog, McFarland |
Confirmed |
|
8 |
10/25 |
MEMS Devices & Economics of Manufacturing |
Schmidt |
Confirmed |
-- |
9 |
11/1 |
Student Presentations |
-- |
-- |
-- |
10 |
11/8 |
Conference |
TBD |
In Process |
Participating in Telecom TRM Conference |
11 |
11/18 |
Aerospace |
Bozdogan |
Inviting |
-- |
12 |
11/22 |
Biological Engineering |
Lauffenberger |
Confirmed |
-- |
-- |
11/29 |
THANKSGIVING |
-- |
-- |
-- |
13 |
12/6 |
Student Presentations |
-- |
-- |
Complete TRM Finale! |
|
12/13 |
POST CLASSES? |
? |
? |
? |
MIT Roadmapping-Related Links
MIT Emerging Technology Matrix:
http://web.media.mit.edu/~davet/notes/emerging-tech-mit.html
MicroPhotonics Center Roadmapping Effort
Example TRM Theses
http://mitsloan.mit.edu/research/clockspeed/main.html
ITRS – International Technology Roadmapping for
Semiconductors
ITRS 2001 Executive Summary Report
http://public.itrs.net/Files/2001ITRS/ExecSum.pdf
Intel’s Perspective on the ITRS
http://www.intel.com/research/silicon/itroadmap.htm
Aerospace Tango Project
http://www.tangoecproject.com/homepage.htm
Electricity Technology Roadmap
http://www.epri.com/corporate/discover_epri/roadmap/
Steel Industry Technology Roadmap
http://www.steel.org/mt/roadmap/roadmap.htm
Lighting Technology Roadmap
http://www.eren.doe.gov/buildings/vision2020/
Robotics & Intelligent Machines RM
http://www.sandia.gov/Roadmap/home.htm
Compound Semiconductor
Computational Chemistry RM
http://www.ccrhq.org/vision/index/roadmaps/
Technology Seminar Series, Lectures, and Conferences
All MIT Research Centers & Labs
http://web.mit.edu/research.html
ILP’s Conference Series on Technology & the Corporation
http://ilp.mit.edu/ilp/Conferences/Current.html
Past Conferences (and Proceedings)
http://ilp.mit.edu/ilp/Conferences/Past.html
ILP’s CTO Lecture Series
http://ilp.mit.edu/ilp/Conferences/CTO.html
ILP’s Industry Leader Lecture Series
http://ilp.mit.edu/ilp/Conferences/Industry.html
General MIT Events
MicroPhotonics Center Seminars
http://web.mit.edu/mphotonics/www/sem-series.shtml
Lab for Energy & the Environment Calendar
AI Lab Talks & Seminars
http://www.ai.mit.edu/events/talks/talks.shtml
LCS Calendar of Events
http://www.lcs.mit.edu/calendar/index.phtml
MTL VLSI Seminar Series
http://www-mtl.mit.edu/mtlhome/9Semi/Fall02/ALL.html
McGovern Institute for Brain Research
http://web.mit.edu/mcgovern/html/Events_and_Seminars/events_and_seminars.shtml
Nanostructures Seminar Series
http://nanoweb.mit.edu/seminar%20info/seminars.html
…and many more out there
Possible Tech Roadmapping Technology Domains include, but
are not limited to:
Semiconductors
Genomics / Proteomics / Celleomics
Wireless
MEMS
Smart Materials
Cyrogenics
Soft Lithography
Neurotechnology
Nanotechnology
Organotechnology
Biological Engineering
Gerontechnology
Autonomous Systems
Books that address various
aspects of the topic include:
·
Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of
Temporary Advantage, Charles H. Fine, Perseus Books, 1998.
·
Strategic Operations: Competing through Capabilities, Robert H.
Hayes, Gary P. Pisano, and David M. Upton, Harvard Business School, 1996
·
Operations Strategies for
Competitive Advantage: Text and Cases,
E.C. Etienne-Hamilton, Dryden Press, 1994
·
Manufacturing Strategy: Text and Cases, Terry Hill, Richard D.
Irwin, 1994.
·
Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, B.
Joseph Pine II, Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
·
Operations Strategy: Text and Cases, David A. Garvin,
Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1992.
·
The Machine that Changed the
World: The Story of Lean Production,
James P. Womack, Daniel T. Jones, and Daniel Roos, Rawson Associates, 1990.
·
Revitalizing Manufacturing: Text and Cases, Janice A. Klein, Irwin,
1990.
·
Made In America: Regaining the Productive Edge, Michael L.
Dertouzos, Richard K. Lester, and Robert M. Solow, MIT Press, 1989.
·
Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization, Robert
H. Hayes, Steven C. Wheelwright, and Kim B. Clark, The Free Press, 1988.
·
Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of
the Post-Industrial Economy, Stephen S. Cohen and John Zysman, Basic
Books, 1987.